- This post is for members of OUInsider only. Join now! Subscribe Now
James Hale ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
10083 votes total - (12590)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of OUInsider only. Join now! Subscribe Now
- This post is for members of OUInsider only. Join now! Subscribe Now
pantheraonca
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1991 votes total - (1252)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of OUInsider only. Join now! Subscribe Now
soonerhorseman
- 4 stars Rating: 64
533 votes total - (650)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
bearcreekfan said...
It seems like this was 3XT's real concern. I did the same thing with the Durron Neal article today. I knew I read it, but it was edited by James and the headline on the board turned red, as if I hadn't read it. It wasn't a big deal and there was no * since James hadn't added any comments, but it was confusing at first since I was trying to figure out if it was a new/different article on Neal.
-
3XT said...
Whenever I read a recruiting report or anything posted by the administration, I come back later and see that the post has been edited by James Hale or Dave Hunt or whoever, sometimes as many as three times. Thus, the topic turns to red again and I find I'm reading the same thing. Why is this done?
This post was edited by James Hale on 5/16/2012 at 9:25 AM
“Any people anywhere........have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better.”
Why so much editing of posts? *