-
greensooner ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1999 votes total - My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them!!!
- (15689)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Stuck in Mexas ●
- 5 stars Rating: 81
1212 votes total - (2696)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
3. I know that Rice is not a good team, but NINE TD passes is just stupid. At what point do you just start dropping 9? Seriously.6. A young but talented TCU team looks like it is starting to get things together. They are 6-2 now and looked pretty good in their win over BYU where they led 35-10 at one point, especially in ST play and in the turnover margin (3-0). They have one more game (against Wyoming) to work out some more kinks before they travel to Boise. TCU looks like the only team left on Boise's schedule that has a real chance to pull off the upset.
.10. Michigan won again to stretch their record to 7-1. If Michigan can beat Nebraska on 11/19 it is quite possible that UM, MSU, and NU could all be 11-1 (7-1) in a perfect 3-way tie like we saw with OU/UT/TT in 2008.
17. It appears that Navy's ability to beat ND is on hiatus. I enjoyed seeing Navy beat them a few times recently, and I'm glad I was able to see it, because it may not happen again for a while. That said, ND has barely a prayer of going to a BCS game, even if they somehow manage to beat Stanford. With 1 of the 10 spots guarenteed to a mid-major (for all practical purposes), 9-3 isn't going to get it done.
-
Matteon said...
24. I'm anxious to see which OU team shows up on Saturday to give A&M its sendoff. I'll be in the stands to find out.
5. If Boise gets into the NCG I'll be rooting for them with every ounce of strength I can muster. Even the mighty SEC would not be able to live down losing to Boise State in the NCG.
-
Matteon said...
3. I thought Landry Jones played better this week than last week (obviously), especially considering the wind. One thing I noticed though, was that he and Stills' timing was off. Jones was just late and off target on his deep throws to Stills several times before Stills finally pulled one down in the third quarter.
- This post is for members of OUInsider or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
MDS00NER said...
6. Yea and if the Mountain West hadn't hadn't been giving lessons on first class douchebaggery, that game SHOULD have been in Ft Worth, NOT in Boise. Their reasons for changing that game's location were beyond laughable.
10. I think you are wrong here. Since Wisconsin blew Nebraska out of Camp Randall, another Nebraska loss would put them at 2 losses (both in conference) if Michigan were to beat them.
-
SoonerinTopeka
- 5 stars Rating: 85
144 votes total - (309)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SlicedBread said...
Thanks for doing these, Matteon. Count me among those that looks forward to each week's epistle.
27. Turner Gill gets way too much credit for his job at Buffalo. He had one winning season there (2008, 8-6), but instead of building on it, he regressed. Gill's 2009 Buffalo team stumbled to a 5-7 record, including an ugly 3-5 mark in the wretched MAC. Gill was fortunate to parlay such dubious success into a BCS-AQ job. To say he built a "winning program" is very generous.
-
GeorgiaCrimson
- 5 stars Rating: 94
320 votes total - (536)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
NateM67 said...
I respectfully disagree about the kickoff strategy. I trust our defense a lot more against a one-dimensional offense than I trust our kickoff coverage. Recognize your weaknesses and gameplan to cover them up. Also, the first kick would have worked better if the bounce hadn't taken such a sharp angle. 2 guys almost touched it and the ball would have been around the 30 yard line. Having them start at the 40 isn't optimal, but it's better than giving up a TD against a hot returner on a team that would otherwise have trouble scoring at all. Don't need to give the home team any extra momentum.
I equate the kickoff strategy to the use of Blake Bell in short yardage. We have had trouble in both areas before, so we were looking at different ways to attack those problems. I appreciate that we are trying to do something innovative instead of trying to beat our heads into a wall. The best solution would obviously be to be able to effectively run the ball in short yardage situations and to be able to cover kickoffs well, but even with extra focus for a few years now on those problem areas, we've only gotten so much better. Glad to see us try a few different tactics, even with the growing pains that might be associated.
-
NateM67 said...
I respectfully disagree about the kickoff strategy. I trust our defense a lot more against a one-dimensional offense than I trust our kickoff coverage. Recognize your weaknesses and gameplan to cover them up. Also, the first kick would have worked better if the bounce hadn't taken such a sharp angle. 2 guys almost touched it and the ball would have been around the 30 yard line. Having them start at the 40 isn't optimal, but it's better than giving up a TD against a hot returner on a team that would otherwise have trouble scoring at all. Don't need to give the home team any extra momentum.
I equate the kickoff strategy to the use of Blake Bell in short yardage. We have had trouble in both areas before, so we were looking at different ways to attack those problems. I appreciate that we are trying to do something innovative instead of trying to beat our heads into a wall. The best solution would obviously be to be able to effectively run the ball in short yardage situations and to be able to cover kickoffs well, but even with extra focus for a few years now on those problem areas, we've only gotten so much better. Glad to see us try a few different tactics, even with the growing pains that might be associated.




Thoughts on a quality win, some upsets, and a deeply sad loss