-
Pontius Pilate
- 3 stars Rating: 59
375 votes total - (357)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
SoonerFromDal said...
Not good... losing Box hurts, but I think Wort will be fine. Losing Flemming would hurt (although all signs point to him being back), but I think we have some depth there. Losing the Hammer would hurt the most... we don't have anyone who can come close to replicating his impact on the field this year IMO... but he should be back as well.
soonerbait
Pontius Pilate
- 3 stars Rating: 59
375 votes total - (357)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
burbanksooner1 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
434 votes total - (1231)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
sonofpoweredge
- 3 stars Rating: 51
538 votes total - (670)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
SlicedBread said...
Well, don't crucify me for disagreeing (see what I did there?), but I'm very optimistic about our LB corps in general, including the man you're labeling the "Duke of Whiffington". I expect Wort to make big strides from last year and be a player we can count on every Saturday. With Travis Lewis, Corey Nelson, Tony Jefferson, and Joseph Ibiloye in the mix, I think we'd be more than solid even if Wort didn't perform well.
At corner, I agree that we're much stronger with Fleming back there, and would concur that we'd likely see a bust or two while Lynn adjusts to the starting role. However, even without Fleming, our secondary would be one of the best in the conference. Could our National Title hopes be compromised? Meh, wouldn't help, but it wouldn't destroy them either. We've had plenty of guys in the Stoops era that have shined in their first year at CB. Lynn could be next.
Ronnell is the one among those three that we're least prepared to do without. He brings elite athletic ability that few OT's can hope to compete with, and that no one on our roster can replicate. I really like Geneo Grissom's future, but don't want to be in a position of needing him to start this year. We'd be better served with him being the first DE off the bench, then move him into the starting lineup in 2012.
-
oumodguy
- 5 stars Rating: 86
690 votes total - OU Insider Moderator
- (1392)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
soonerdowns
- 4 stars Rating: 70
1410 votes total - (1723)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
soonerdowns said...
Ronnell has almost zero starting experience as a college football player. Not only that, but he played eight-man football in HS up until his senior year. Regardless of his combine numbers, NFL GM's are going to be hesitant to risk first-round money on a guy that is so unproven. I love the Hammer and think that he is primed to have a break-out year in 2011, but I think it would be best for both Ronnell and whichever NFL team he ends up playing for if Ronnell plays two more years for the Sooners.
-
soonerdowns said...
Ronnell has almost zero starting experience as a college football player. Not only that, but he played eight-man football in HS up until his senior year. Regardless of his combine numbers, NFL GM's are going to be hesitant to risk first-round money on a guy that is so unproven. I love the Hammer and think that he is primed to have a break-out year in 2011, but I think it would be best for both Ronnell and whichever NFL team he ends up playing for if Ronnell plays two more years for the Sooners.
-
burbanksooner1 said...
Very good question posed.
Ronnel has an attitude this D needs this year and Fleming kinda has one, too, and I think that's what these two can bring that replacements wouldn't neccesarily have right off the bat.
Austin, RIP, is with them in spirit and though he's not putting on the pads, he's kinda our 12th man, if you will, because they're all gonna play for him.



If I were to tell you that our D would not have...