Online Now 712

OUInsider - Owen Field

The place for the most trusted source for reliable, accurate information on OU Sports

On this Board 368
Record: 3486 (2/3/2013)

Online now 711
Record: 4487 (2/14/2012)

Boards ▾

OUInsider - Owen Field

The place for the most trusted source for reliable, accurate information on OU Sports

Basketball & Other Sports

Men's & women's basketball, baseball, softball and other OU sports

O'Connell's Off Topic

The place for discussion on topics not related to the Oklahoma Sooners

Tickets Exchange

The place to buy, sell or trade tickets

Reply

ESPN article on Clemson possibly moving.

  • http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/7970495/clemson-tigers-open-offers-leave-acc-board-chairman-says

    Clemson board talks ACC affiliation
    Updated: May 25, 2012, 2:46 AM ET
    ESPN.com news services

    95
    75
    898
    Email
    Print

    Clemson does not have a viable offer to leave the Atlantic Coast Conference, but the university's Board of Trustees would consider one if it was presented, the panel's chairman said Thursday, according to a report by The Associated Press.

    "We've not had any contact from any league," said board chairman David Wilkins. "If we receive a viable option, a viable proposal, that is presented to us by any league, we will consider it."

    In the meantime, Wilkins said Clemson was not working on any proposal to join another conference, according to the report.

    The Tigers could make more money from the Big 12's television deals than in the ACC, the report said, and the Big 12's formation of a new bowl game with the Southeastern Conference could also be an incentive if the NCAA introduces a four-team playoff format.

    The board met for more than two hours behind closed doors, the AP reported.

    oumodguy

  • I want clemson, florida state g tech and notre dame miami and one other

    IreallyloveOU

  • IreallyloveOU said...

    I want clemson, florida state g tech and notre dame miami and one other

    A 16 team conference would be unwieldy, IMO. Plus, what happens when OU has to play ND, FSU, Tex, Miami, and WVU in a given year when Tex gets to play OU, ISU, KU, Tech, and OSU? In other words, I think the balance of schedules gets very uneven when you have more than 12 teams. Look at Georgia - they don't have to play Bama, LSU or Arkansas this year, but does S. Carolina? That would be a huge advantage for Georgia in their conference standings.

    I like getting back to 12 - add two who add value and would increase the payout per member school. FSU, ND or Miami would all fill that requirement.

    kwest2

  • Could have 2, 8 team divisions and Only play 1 cross divisional a year. Then have champ game that would be less likely to be a repeat of earlier game.

    This is kind of a joke... We could unofficially call our division the big 8 :). The other could be the big east, once that conf disbands

    MTMhOUston

  • MTMhOUston said...

    Could have 2, 8 team divisions and Only play 1 cross divisional a year. Then have champ game that would be less likely to be a repeat of earlier game.

    This is kind of a joke... We could unofficially call our division the big 8 :). The other could be the big east, once that conf disbands

    Big Double 8

    OKCSooner

  • If you had a 16 yeam conference, they would probably divide them into 4 pods. You play your 3 and 2 each from the other 3 each year.

    capclay

  • I want to get to 14 by adding VT, Pitt, Clemson and FSU.

    SoonerSeif

  • SoonerSeif said...

    I want to get to 14 by adding VT, Pitt, Clemson and FSU.

    Subtract Pitt, take ND or Ga Tech

    MDS00NER

  • Twelve teams is plenty- hence still the Big 12. Take FSU, WVU, Clemson and TCU and we're done. Extremely strong conference!!!

    Maybe the fans should start an email campaign focused on the Big 12 offices and Presidents? I think we should strike while the iron's hot! JMHO

    This post was edited by hooknladder on 5/25/2012 at 4:08 PM

    hooknladder

  • I realize that Clemson has a pretty decent football program but other than that, what else do they bring? It can't be that great of a television market. Baseball by itself doesn't add enough IMO. I think at this point the Big 12 can be selective. ND and Fla State would be at the top of any list, of course, but does any of the others add enough financial incentive to make it worthwhile to get to 14? Will be interesting to see how it all shakes out!

    TYCAT947

  • Whether we like it or not, college football appears to be headed toward four 16-team superconferences that will control the college football playoffs.

    Would you rather be the first superconference and invite who you want, or one of the others and scramble to take who's left?

    My shopping list: Notre Dame, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, Florida State, and Miami. You pick first, and all these teams are available. Wait and let some other conference like the SEC pick first and it's only some of these, the Louisvilles and Boises. No thanks. I want my conference to have the first shot.

    "Burnt orange makes me puke!" - Mother Teresa (unverified)

    VladTheEmailer

  • VladTheEmailer said...

    Whether we like it or not, college football appears to be headed toward four 16-team superconferences that will control the college football playoffs.

    Would you rather be the first superconference and invite who you want, or one of the others and scramble to take who's left?

    My shopping list: Notre Dame, Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, Florida State, and Miami. You pick first, and all these teams are available. Wait and let some other conference like the SEC pick first and it's only some of these, the Louisvilles and Boises. No thanks. I want my conference to have the first shot.

    One part of me says no to ND. 1 arrogant team that thinks way too highly of themselves in a conference is enough. But, another part would love to see the cat fights between ND and Texas.

    This post was edited by jimnrh on 5/25/2012 at 5:06 PM

    jimnrh

  • jimnrh said...

    One part of me says no to ND. 1 arrogant team that thinks way too highly of themselves in a conference is enough. But, another part would love to see the cat fights between ND and Texas.

    LOL

    SoonerInJersey

  • I would only accept Notre Dame if they agreed to participate in ALL conference sports. I am sick of all the special treatment they get.

    passingfancy

  • Adding two schools to get back to the original twelve members makes perfectly good sense to me. FSU is my first choice. Clemson, VT, GT, Pitt and Louisville would be among the second school I'd pick, with none of them holding a clear-cut edge.

    I just can't wrap my head around the idea of bringing in ND and Miami; two schools I have hated with a passion for as long as I can remember. The Big 12 already has the most arrogant basketball fans in the Jayhawks. Why would we want to invite the most arrogant football fans to join the Big 12 family? That's especially true of the Irish. Anyone who doesn't think that Notre Dame would be as demanding as Texas, maybe more so, better think again. Revenue and prestige aside, we're better off without them!

    DandyD

  • No to Notre Dame make them join the big 10 where they belong. A big pain in the arse....

    noblemark

  • MDS00NER said...

    Subtract Pitt, take ND or Ga Tech

    I don't see the hype around GT. What do they bring to the table? I'd rather have Louisville over GT.

    SoonerSeif

  • Since dollars drive most of these decisions, GT would give the Big12 entree into the desirable Atlanta TV market. Even if that weren't the case, GT is a legitimate BCS-level program with a fine tradition in college football (Google Bobby Dodd), moreso than Louisville. Academically, GT would be in the upper echelon of the conference. What exactly does Louisville bring to the table?

    "Burnt orange makes me puke!" - Mother Teresa (unverified)

    VladTheEmailer

  • Expand to 12 teams and stay at that. Add Florida State and one other. Personally, I would rather get Georgia Tech, then Clemson. Ideally, you would add FSU, then call Arkansas one more time and try to get them. Clemson doesn't do much for me.

    CobraKai

  • VladTheEmailer said...

    Since dollars drive most of these decisions, GT would give the Big12 entree into the desirable Atlanta TV market. Even if that weren't the case, GT is a legitimate BCS-level program with a fine tradition in college football (Google Bobby Dodd), moreso than Louisville. Academically, GT would be in the upper echelon of the conference. What exactly does Louisville bring to the table?

    Louisville is a basketball power, they have a huge donor, they have state of the art facilities, they tie in WVU and they have a lot of potential in football. GT has bad facilities, poor fan support and a below average athletic program. Plus, I think GT has capped out in football and I really think Louisville has much more potential. Thats just my opinion though.

    SoonerSeif

  • Being we weren’t in the computer age at the time you didn’t see as much of it in print but I would bet some of the arguments we are hearing now are the same we heard when talk first started about going from the Big-8 to the Big-12. Then after all was said and done the Big-12 worked alright for a number of years. Sure we had some rough spots here and there but the sky didn’t fall in on us like some were saying would happen.

    The writing is on the wall about this and it looks like the way it’s going to shake out is going to be four supper conferences. We can either lead the way or we can take whatever is left over after other conferences cherry pick the landscape. As for ND and Miami the only folks I don’t hear talking about these two schools are ND and Miami. I really don’t think either have much interest in joining us in the Big-12. My money would be on Miami looking for an invite to the SEC and if they go anywhere I think ND would be in the Big-10. I think we should approach them on a feasibility search but in the end I don’t really think we will ever be in a conference with those two schools.

    NevadaSooner

  • SoonerSeif, I'll say this again: this whole realignment thing is football-centric. Louisville indeed has an excellent basketball program, but their football is not top-tier, regardless of its potential.

    GT brings the Atlanta market, a real plus when negotiating future tv contracts. Their football program may be down now, ala OU pre-Stoops, but that can be remedied, ala a Stoops-like hire.

    Membership in the ACC, a basketball-dominated conference, has likely contributed to the overall erosion of ACC football. Membership in a conference where football is king might be just the thing the GT program needs.

    All in all, I think the greater potential exists with GT, but that's just my opinion.

    This post was edited by VladTheEmailer on 5/26/2012 at 6:26 PM

    "Burnt orange makes me puke!" - Mother Teresa (unverified)

    VladTheEmailer

  • We can agree to disagree because I don't think Saban could turn GT into a premier football program. I don't see the similarities between OU and GT because OU had been a national power for 40 years prior to the 90s. I'll give you the Atlanta market though but that's still an SEC city and state. The SEC headquarters are in ATL.

    SoonerSeif

  • passingfancy said...

    I would only accept Notre Dame if they agreed to participate in ALL conference sports. I am sick of all the special treatment they get.

    Agree completely.

    Only1Oklahoma

  • If Notre Dame wanted to get into the Big 12 they can't move football until their current TV contract runs out. So if Big 12/DeBoss Dodds agrees to bring in their olympic sports now it will be in hopes that football follows in a few years.

    GaTech probably will continue to be a middle of the pac program but Atlanta will always be a huge TV market that would be very valuable for TV contract negotiations now and in the future.....Louisville does not bring that.

    16 teams unwieldy...no. The BCS and Bowl system as we now know it is what's unwieldy. The Big 12 suddenly finds itself in a position of strength and now is not the time to go conservative. Get as many teams as possible that add value to the conference because after this next round of expansion there won't be many teams left in play that will help any conference.

    Now is the time for win/win for the Big 12. Every team of value we bring in now damages some other conference. We get stronger they have less options.

    OURICH