Online Now 371

O'Connell's Off Topic

The place for discussion on topics not related to the Oklahoma Sooners

On this Board 25
Record: 506 (3/9/2012)

Online now 365
Record: 4487 (2/14/2012)

Boards ▾

OUInsider - Owen Field

The place for the most trusted source for reliable, accurate information on OU Sports

Basketball & Other Sports

Men's & women's basketball, baseball, softball and other OU sports

O'Connell's Off Topic

The place for discussion on topics not related to the Oklahoma Sooners

Tickets Exchange

The place to buy, sell or trade tickets

Reply

The Black National Anthem

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQtse2B4Khk
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR128TuCGkU&feature=related

    Lift every voice and sing!!!!!

    The first was Tina Marie using the words of the black national anthem with the US national anthem notes. The second is the correct way to sing it.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • Wow, never knew that existed. Why do black people have their own national anthem?

    soonermaverick

  • They tried to play this at a pep rally once at my HS. A near riot ensued.

    OU_dup

  • soonermaverick said...

    Wow, never knew that existed. Why do black people have their own national anthem?

    Same reason they have their own month I guess..

    maskedmedic

  • soonermaverick said...

    Wow, never knew that existed. Why do black people have their own national anthem?

    Well, the national anthem didnt seem to apply to us at the time we decided to accept this as ours. Everything else was seperate from drinking fountains to schools, so we had to try to develope our own things. This was a step in taking pride in ourselves. Singing the traditional anthem didnt seem right since we werent seen or treated as equal. Why on earth would we take pride in the american anthem when we were being treated so badly?

    As to the reason we have our own month. Its because our contributions, struggles and accomplishments were ignored in the teachings of american history. Today, they teach a few things, but its still white dominated. Thats supposed to be the purpose of the month, but it still fails. More needs to be done. Some say we dont need it, but if we taught only black history in schools and later, blended just a bit of white in, I promise you would have a different take on it.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • It is racism.

    “Any people anywhere........have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better.”

    zeeb10

  • Sorry Bman, but this idea just doesn't fly with me. "White" people, and by that I mean Europeans and their descendants, simply have a history that is far more recorded and lengthy than "black" people do. That would equate for a big difference in the amount of significant history each group has. You could argue that other groups and races who aren't white have made more of a contribution than "black" people but don't have/need a month to talk about it.

    Also, maybe you could answer this question for me. From what I know about the slave trade, one African tribe would sell another to the slave trade. And correct me if that's wrong. My question is, have African-Americans ever been mad at those tribes they were sold by? Since they were equal partner in the trade, aren't they just as guilty?

    soonermaverick

  • soonermaverick said...

    Sorry Bman, but this idea just doesn't fly with me. "White" people, and by that I mean Europeans and their descendants, simply have a history that is far more recorded and lengthy than "black" people do. That would equate for a big difference in the amount of significant history each group has. You could argue that other groups and races who aren't white have made more of a contribution than "black" people but don't have/need a month to talk about it.

    Also, maybe you could answer this question for me. From what I know about the slave trade, one African tribe would sell another to the slave trade. And correct me if that's wrong. My question is, have African-Americans ever been mad at those tribes they were sold by? Since they were equal partner in the trade, aren't they just as guilty?

    The reason black history isnt taught is to further entrench white superiority. It makes black people want live close to and be like white folks, but we arent for the most part accepted as such. OJ simpson learned that fact quick, fast and in a hurry during his trial. We have plenty of documetation to teach it, thats why they offer and teach it in college. That being said, not everyone goes to college.

    You are correct, we sold each other into "service" under the conditions that we were going to be treated as workers, not less than animals.

    I dont know if they were mad or not. We were being traded under the premise of work, not less than human treatment. Are black americans mad today? Nope, our knowledge of our homeland has been beaten and taught out of us. Our connection with Africa was taken away and anyone that would try re-established that connection was undermined by the FBI and stupid black people that would spy for them. You saw that in the Marcus Garvey and Black Panther Party stories.

    No, they arent as guilty. If I give sell you a dog, I am thinking you are going to take care of that dog and raise it with love and care. Now, if you decide to beat, fight, burn and skin that dog alive, why should I be guilty? I thought you were going to treat the dog well but you turned out be the scum of the earth and treated the dog really bad. So, are we mad today, nope. Not at all.

    Why dont the other races feel a need to talk about it? Well, their cultures have remained in tact for the most part. They remember their homeland and traditions. We were treated differently. We were brought here, we were bred to create the best slave possible. Reggie White and Serena Williams, in love of not, had to breed to make a better product. Then, after they had a couple of kids, they were killed so that they couldnt teach anything about the homeland. In place of that teaching was whatever the white decided. That decision was that everything white was good and everything black was bad. White was human, black was less than an animal, property. We are still trying to overcome that superior/subordinate relationship to this very day. Thats why we want our history told and told in a way that we want it told, not white people. It may be explosive, but it will benefit us greatly.

    A couple of questions for you;

    1. What would significant history?
    2. Are you saying black history shouldnt be taught because we dont have enough contributions?

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • Ever heard the saying, blossom where you're planted? We all have to deal with life's unfair circumstances. Not too many people have everything handed to them, and for the few that are born with silver spoons in their mouths, these are disadvantaged by not having to forge their own way which builds character.

    If you want to be an African, move to Africa. If you want to be an American, then be one. Help define what it is to be a noble American by being a man of high moral fiber.

    God is spot on in addressing the ills of man by tearing down the dividing walls of separatism based upon race, wealth, status, intellect and the like. These are merely external things which have nothing to do with the value of men. He says to rather focus on the imperishable qualities of a gentle and quiet spirit in loving one another as self, and to no longer observe, identify and recognize any man by the superficial outward things.

    Your approach does nothing but foster more racism and division amoung men.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • bruthaman said...

    The reason black history isnt taught is to further entrench white superiority. It makes black people want live close to and be like white folks, but we arent for the most part accepted as such. OJ simpson learned that fact quick, fast and in a hurry during his trial. We have plenty of documetation to teach it, thats why they offer and teach it in college. That being said, not everyone goes to college.

    You are correct, we sold each other into "service" under the conditions that we were going to be treated as workers, not less than animals.

    I dont know if they were mad or not. We were being traded under the premise of work, not less than human treatment. Are black americans mad today? Nope, our knowledge of our homeland has been beaten and taught out of us. Our connection with Africa was taken away and anyone that would try re-established that connection was undermined by the FBI and stupid black people that would spy for them. You saw that in the Marcus Garvey and Black Panther Party stories.

    No, they arent as guilty. If I give sell you a dog, I am thinking you are going to take care of that dog and raise it with love and care. Now, if you decide to beat, fight, burn and skin that dog alive, why should I be guilty? I thought you were going to treat the dog well but you turned out be the scum of the earth and treated the dog really bad. So, are we mad today, nope. Not at all.

    Why dont the other races feel a need to talk about it? Well, their cultures have remained in tact for the most part. They remember their homeland and traditions. We were treated differently. We were brought here, we were bred to create the best slave possible. Reggie White and Serena Williams, in love of not, had to breed to make a better product. Then, after they had a couple of kids, they were killed so that they couldnt teach anything about the homeland. In place of that teaching was whatever the white decided. That decision was that everything white was good and everything black was bad. White was human, black was less than an animal, property. We are still trying to overcome that superior/subordinate relationship to this very day. Thats why we want our history told and told in a way that we want it told, not white people. It may be explosive, but it will benefit us greatly.

    A couple of questions for you;

    1. What would significant history? 2. Are you saying black history shouldnt be taught because we dont have enough contributions?

    What part of black history is being left out of school? What major historical events did I miss in school that otherwise wouldn't allow this further "entrenchment"? If you truly believe your first sentence then you have no interest in progress.

    Spare us all this fictional tale about Africans selling each other into "service". You can't for a second believe that. The fact that one person is selling another should be the red flag, but if that wasn't enough seeing their fellow Africans chained together and stacked on ships probably gave them a pretty good idea of what was going on. Its ok to admit that. No country or continent has a perfect record.

    And please don't bring up these tales of the FBI and then attempt to make the black panthers credible witnesses. They aren't interested in progress either.

    No one is saying that black history shouldn't be taught because of lack of contributions, but what current curriculum do you want bumped in favor of black history? WWII? The Civil War? The Revolutionary War? Washington? Lincoln? Roosevelt? The Declaration of Independence?

    OU_dup

  • soonerman504 said...

    Your approach does nothing but foster more racism and division amoung men.

    pot meet kettle

    soonerprices

  • bruthaman said...

    The reason black history isnt taught is to further entrench white superiority.

    Nothing further needs to be said.

    TIMB0B

  • OUDodger said...

    What part of black history is being left out of school? What major historical events did I miss in school that otherwise wouldn't allow this further "entrenchment"? If you truly believe your first sentence then you have no interest in progress.

    Spare us all this fictional tale about Africans selling each other into "service". You can't for a second believe that. The fact that one person is selling another should be the red flag, but if that wasn't enough seeing their fellow Africans chained together and stacked on ships probably gave them a pretty good idea of what was going on. Its ok to admit that. No country or continent has a perfect record.

    And please don't bring up these tales of the FBI and then attempt to make the black panthers credible witnesses. They aren't interested in progress either.

    No one is saying that black history shouldn't be taught because of lack of contributions, but what current curriculum do you want bumped in favor of black history? WWII? The Civil War? The Revolutionary War? Washington? Lincoln? Roosevelt? The Declaration of Independence?

    Well, in all those wars, other than the revolutionary I think, we were descriminated against, officer and enlisted alike. Washtington was a slave owner, murderer and rapist so screw him. Lincoln didnt believe we should be part of America, so screw him too and the declaration of independence wasnt written with us in mind either. Something like 15 days after Thomas Jefferson said all men are created equal, he went down to give his notes on the state of Virginia and said we had more in common with monkeys than humans. His actions showed which side of that contradition he stood on.

    So, we could remove all of those. Or perhaps we could use each as a teaching point as to how the white man created the competitive, social, economical and political gap for himself and cast the black race in an inferior light.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • soonerprices said...

    pot meet kettle

    I do nothing to promote racism in the least. Quite the opposite in fact.

    As for division, my message is all together positive in that it concerns the Christ who has torn down the walls of separation that have always divided men in every single way.

    Where people become divided in regards to my message is in choosing or rejecting God and His way, and truth and life. It is not my intention or objective nor God's to CAUSE division. Division here is simply the natural response to the rejection of the hope and glory for all men. Those who oppose God and His saving grace are the culprits, not God nor my message about God.

    Your implication would be to denigrate the one who wishes to save lives as in the folowing illustration ; Me saying "The bridge is out up ahead. All who do not want to perish, please turn to the right." Then, when many refuse and instead keep on going towards the drop off. , you would stand back and shout "You are wrong for causing this division amoung these men." It would be rediculous in such a case for someone to sit back and insult the man trying to save each and every one by proclaiming the truth of the impending danger simply on the basis that some would listen and some would not.

    If you look at Jesus' ministry, many times even after mircales and raising the dead it would say of the on lookers, "and the people were divided". This is an unaviodable issue that no man can escape in choosing or rejecting God and on that basis men will always be divided.

    If you want to say I CAUSE divisions, than that is certainly your unreasonable prerogative.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • bruthaman said...

    Well, in all those wars, other than the revolutionary I think, we were descriminated against, officer and enlisted alike. Washtington was a slave owner, murderer and rapist so screw him. Lincoln didnt believe we should be part of America, so screw him too and the declaration of independence wasnt written with us in mind either. Something like 15 days after Thomas Jefferson said all men are created equal, he went down to give his notes on the state of Virginia and said we had more in common with monkeys than humans. His actions showed which side of that contradition he stood on.

    So, we could remove all of those. Or perhaps we could use each as a teaching point as to how the white man created the competitive, social, economical and political gap for himself and cast the black race in an inferior light.

    Or, you can continually harp on the past which none of us had anything to do with and in the process not accomplish anything because you do not deal with the present but only the past.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • soonerman504 said...

    I do nothing to promote racism in the least. Quite the opposite in fact.

    As for division, my message is all together positive in that it concerns the Christ who has torn down the walls of separation that have always divided men in every single way.

    Where people become divided in regards to my message is in choosing or rejecting God and His way, and truth and life. It is not my intention or objective nor God's to CAUSE division. Division here is simply the natural response to the rejection of the hope and glory for all men. Those who oppose God and His saving grace are the culprits, not God nor my message about God.

    Your implication would be to denigrate the one who wishes to save lives as in the folowing illustration ; Me saying "The bridge is out up ahead. All who do not want to perish, please turn to the right." Then, when many refuse and instead keep on going towards the drop off. , you would stand back and shout "You are wrong for causing this division amoung these men." It would be rediculous in such a case for someone to sit back and insult the man trying to save each and every one by proclaiming the truth of the impending danger simply on the basis that some would listen and some would not.

    If you look at Jesus' ministry, many times even after mircales and raising the dead it would say of the on lookers, "and the people were divided". This is an unaviodable issue that no man can escape in choosing or rejecting God and on that basis men will always be divided.

    If you want to say I CAUSE divisions, than that is certainly your unreasonable prerogative.

    I was referring more to the fact that "your approach" wasn't real effective.

    soonerprices

  • soonerprices said...

    I was referring more to the fact that "your approach" wasn't real effective.

    I don't concern myself so much with man's ideas on aproach and such but rather on God's. as for effectiveness, I just plant seeds. I cannot make them grow.

    Regardless, at least I do something which is more than most I'm afraid. Hiding the lamp under the bed is not very effective either.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • bruthaman said...

    The reason black history isnt taught is to further entrench white superiority. OJ simpson learned that fact quick, fast and in a hurry during his trial. We have plenty of documetation to teach it, thats why they offer and teach it in college.

    You are correct, we sold each other into "service" under the conditions that we were going to be treated as workers, not less than animals.

    1. What would significant history?
    2. Are you saying black history shouldnt be taught because we dont have enough contributions?

    Your first sentence is rediculous. What's crazy is that you actually believe it. OJ is a murderer and even most black people realize that. Can't believe you would use him as an example.

    AFAM shoudn't even be a degree, it's a joke and a complete waste of time. Everyone tries to take them as electives because they're basically blow-off classes.

    The "service" think is laughable. You know good and well that the people sold were already slaves. And most likely treated way worse than they were treated here. African tribes are STILL practicing mass genocide, rape, and inequality today. You think they were more civil 300 years ago?

    1. Don't know what this question means. Significant history is self-explanatory.
    2. I'm saying there should be no such thing as "black" history, or "white" history, or "green" history. Only history.

    soonermaverick

  • bruthaman said...

    Well, in all those wars, other than the revolutionary I think, we were descriminated against, officer and enlisted alike. Washtington was a slave owner, murderer and rapist so screw him. Lincoln didnt believe we should be part of America, so screw him too and the declaration of independence wasnt written with us in mind either. Something like 15 days after Thomas Jefferson said all men are created equal, he went down to give his notes on the state of Virginia and said we had more in common with monkeys than humans. His actions showed which side of that contradition he stood on.

    So, we could remove all of those. Or perhaps we could use each as a teaching point as to how the white man created the competitive, social, economical and political gap for himself and cast the black race in an inferior light.

    Not sure where you went to school (or if you went to school), but in high school and college I learned about the good, bad and ugly of our founding fathers.

    Do you find it odd or hypocritical that you ignore the bad and ugly parts of your own people's history, but then claim that "whites" are doing the same?

    Sorry, but I just don't find you to be genuine. If you want accurate history for one, you should want it for all and I don't think you want that. The English, Irish and many other European countries have dark histories that aren't taught in great detail either. I see it as the responsibility of families to pass history such as this along from generation to generation. But honestly, I'm an American and nothing else. The faster people acknowledge the same and quit whining about how they're being persecuted against, the better this country becomes.

    OU_dup

  • soonermaverick said...

    Your first sentence is rediculous. What's crazy is that you actually believe it. OJ is a murderer and even most black people realize that. Can't believe you would use him as an example.

    AFAM shoudn't even be a degree, it's a joke and a complete waste of time. Everyone tries to take them as electives because they're basically blow-off classes.

    The "service" think is laughable. You know good and well that the people sold were already slaves. And most likely treated way worse than they were treated here. African tribes are STILL practicing mass genocide, rape, and inequality today. You think they were more civil 300 years ago?

    1. Don't know what this question means. Significant history is self-explanatory. 2. I'm saying there should be no such thing as "black" history, or "white" history, or "green" history. Only history.

    1. The question isnt self expanatory. What do you consider significant history?
    2. You are right, there shouldnt be, but due to the way history is written and taught by your forfathers, that need is now necessary.

    You miss the point on OJ. Its not a matter of if he is a murderer or not, its how quickly his white friends showed him how white he was when he was accused. The verdict is irrelevant in this arguement. How the country was divided along racial lines is.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • bruthaman said...

    1. The question isnt self expanatory. What do you consider significant history? 2. You are right, there shouldnt be, but due to the way history is written and taught by your forfathers, that need is now necessary.

    You miss the point on OJ. Its not a matter of if he is a murderer or not, its how quickly his white friends showed him how white he was when he was accused. The verdict is irrelevant in this arguement. How the country was divided along racial lines is.

    The context for the significance is whether or not it should be taught in school. Obviously there is limited time, and therefore limited depth into history that can be taught in school. I believe that in reality, too much time is spent on black history in school because in most schools, including elementary, students are force fed black history for an entire month. Of course they learn about black history every other month as well as it relates to the lesson.

    If anything should be done, it's to get rid of black history month.

    OJ's friends treated him badly because they realized he was a MURDERER!! Not because he was black! Terrible example.

    And since you did not refute any of my other statements I can assume that you either agree, or have no way to argue them.

    Agree to disagree, I don't really think that I will ever understand your position. And you give no facts to support it.

    soonermaverick

  • OUDodger said...

    Not sure where you went to school (or if you went to school), but in high school and college I learned about the good, bad and ugly of our founding fathers.

    Do you find it odd or hypocritical that you ignore the bad and ugly parts of your own people's history, but then claim that "whites" are doing the same?

    Sorry, but I just don't find you to be genuine. If you want accurate history for one, you should want it for all and I don't think you want that. The English, Irish and many other European countries have dark histories that aren't taught in great detail either. I see it as the responsibility of families to pass history such as this along from generation to generation. But honestly, I'm an American and nothing else. The faster people acknowledge the same and quit whining about how they're being persecuted against, the better this country becomes.

    I havent ignored our dark past at all. In many of the stories i have posted, it shows how we have undermined our own progress by accepting deals with the white man. It happened to Garvey and the Black Panthers. It happened to MLK and Malcolm X too. Thats our dark past is giving in to the white mans desire for our own selfish needs. There were sellouts planted in almost every black organization that was trying to get some black unity and pride going. Thats our dark past. Not the tribal cheifs. Remember, we were brainwashed of our knowledge of our homeland by killing all the adults slaves so they couldnt teach our traditions to our children.

    Now, I focus on what has happened in America, but I guess to make you guys feel better, you want to talk about what happened in Africa before we got here to try to take blame away from your racist savage land stealing forefathers. Well, you have heard it here first. In whatever capacity we were traded, sold or stolen, your pick, whoever did it to us is scum. I dont care if it was a tribal cheif or the captain of the Amistad. They are all the same.

    I want accurate history for black people. If the others want it, they should speak up. The others havent been through what black people have for as long as we have and again, our families were killed in order to keep us from teaching our history and to allow the white man to fill our brains with untruths. Victors write the history.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • bruthaman said...

    Victors write the history.

    Should be able to write a damn good piece on prison then, cause ya'll are kicking serious a$$ at that.

    soonermaverick

  • soonermaverick said...

    Should be able to write a damn good piece on prison then, cause ya'll are kicking serious a$$ at that.

    No we arent. Youre winning that one too. The battle is in the courts and we lose that one way more often than not. So, you lose again.

    To get back on topic, the Black National Anthem is a great song. I am very proud of it and I am glad we have it. The only fault I have with it is that it isnt heard enough. Hopefully, that will change.

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • Well, let's just bring back full segreation and y'all can have your own water fountains too. Seems you are wanting to move back to the way things were.

    Bet that makes MLK happy to see all of his efforts being thwarted by the people he fought and died for.

    “Any people anywhere........have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better.”

    zeeb10