-
TIMB0B said...
There's no point in arguing either way. The crux of the argument is about civil liberties. Should gays be allowed to marry? If you believe in individual rights, YES.
The bigger question should be, why is the government involved with marriage to begin with? Marriage was originally a religious function, so let the churches decide on who they want to marry. And yes, there are thousands that would gladly accept and marry gays.
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
soonerman504 said...
Surely you relaize you have to draw the line somewhere, Tim. How about if a man wants to marry a 13 year old girl or how about his own sister ? Aren't these considered moral issues ? I think you are prostituting morals and godliness for the sake of promoting your civil liberties ideology. You go too far with it for the sake of your agenda.
I don't know if you are a Christian or not, but churches should not be involved in advocating anything that goes against God's word by marrying gays.
-
soonerprices
- 4 stars Rating: 61
277 votes total - Bob Phrapples +3989 posts
- (479)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
cyberthoth said...
Sorry Tim I was actually trying to reply to 87Sooner and Soonerman not you. I agree with your points on this.
As to the question about incest I don't know if that's a genetic trait or not. I don't know anyone who's committed it willingly to ask. I guess in theory there could be some genetic quality that makes people attracted to someone with like qualities hence incest.
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
soonerprices
- 4 stars Rating: 61
277 votes total - Bob Phrapples +3989 posts
- (479)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
cyberthoth said...
Soonerman I will gladly fight for your right to believe whatever bigoted BS your religion feels is necessary inside its Church but that stuff has no place in our government or our laws.
You wanna believe gays are sinners fine. Do so in church. Your children can learn to hate gays, Muslims and whoever else in Bible school. Leave it there.
Legally our government is not a theocracy and 2 out of every 10 citizens aren't Christians. Science looks at evidence and the fact millions of people say they were born gay IS evidence. Someday we will figure out why and that will be evidence too.
You ask where do we draw the line in the sand, I say here. Leave adults to do whatever they want behind closed doors as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
Gay marriage fine. Smoke pot fine. Cook Meth, not fine. Pedophiles not fine. It's easy and it's smaller government, something you Tea Partiers say you're for.
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
TIMB0B said...
Quote box isn't working for some reason, but this is to Soonerman...
To put it simply, the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
In other words, states' rights overrule the federal government unless otherwise authorized by the Constitution. To paraphrase James Madison, the federal government's powers are delegated to external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.
So, to be more specific, I draw the line at government bureaucracies that regulate our lives, which are unconstitutional.
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
TIMB0B said...
Quote box isn't working for some reason, but this is to Soonerman...
To put it simply, the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
In other words, states' rights overrule the federal government unless otherwise authorized by the Constitution. To paraphrase James Madison, the federal government's powers are delegated to external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.
So, to be more specific, I draw the line at government bureaucracies that regulate our lives, which are unconstitutional.
-
OUDodger said...
Soonerman.... Just quit talking about science because you know nothing about it. Saying that scientists have identified certain genes, but you don't believe it makes you look like a fool. If we all lived like you we'd be worried about falling off the edge of the earth.
If a doctor tells you that your kid has some terrible genetic disorder are you going to tell him that he's wrong? Hell no you won't! You'll be following his every instruction in fighting whatever the ailment might be. Your disbelief in science is always selective to fit whatever argument you might be in and is always subject to change. For that, you are a hypocrite.
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
soonerprices
- 4 stars Rating: 61
277 votes total - Bob Phrapples +3989 posts
- (479)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
veritas1 said...
You should read the Supreme Court opinions (written by Justices from both sides of the political spectrum) that address the application of the Tenth Amendment. As you'll see, it means essentially nothing and that your sentence above that begins with "[i]n other words," is not correct.
-
soonerman504 said...
It would be very beneficial if you would quit putting words in my mouth. As per usual, you falsely assume and project much into what I say and it is (as usual) way off base. I NEVER said nor will say that science is useless and 100% in error. All I have ever said is that it is not 100% complete because of it's inherent limitations. This is something you refuse to acknowledge for some reason.
Your abusive attacks on my words is a nothing but a simple method of exaggerating a person's words to the point of absurdity to discount everything he says. This is the method liberals employ against conservatives.
As for looking like a fool, I'd say rather it is someone who stoops to the level of exaggerating and distorting what another person says for the purpose of validating his own views. I would think an astute person with 2 degrees could handle his own without resorting to cheap stunts like this.
In the end, you have your own belief structure which is obviously based heavily upon the limited observations of science, and I have mine which are based heavily upon the truths of God and substantiated to me in my spirit.
Evidently you are offended and angered by my rejection of your belief system and that is why you fell compelled to resort to cheap stunts like these.
Sorry, you can fool others but you cannot fool me. My house is built upon the solid rock. You can attack my words all you wish but they cannot effect me personally because my person of "self" has been crucified. My only motive for rebuttal to you and those like you is in standing with and for the truth as a testimony to the world, such as it is.
God's abundant grace to you all.
-
soonerman504 said...
It would be very beneficial if you would quit putting words in my mouth. As per usual, you falsely assume and project much into what I say and it is (as usual) way off base. I NEVER said nor will say that science is useless and 100% in error. All I have ever said is that it is not 100% complete because of it's inherent limitations. This is something you refuse to acknowledge for some reason.
Your abusive attacks on my words is a nothing but a simple method of exaggerating a person's words to the point of absurdity to discount everything he says. This is the method liberals employ against conservatives.
As for looking like a fool, I'd say rather it is someone who stoops to the level of exaggerating and distorting what another person says for the purpose of validating his own views. I would think an astute person with 2 degrees could handle his own without resorting to cheap stunts like this.
In the end, you have your own belief structure which is obviously based heavily upon the limited observations of science, and I have mine which are based heavily upon the truths of God and substantiated to me in my spirit.
Evidently you are offended and angered by my rejection of your belief system and that is why you fell compelled to resort to cheap stunts like these.
Sorry, you can fool others but you cannot fool me. My house is built upon the solid rock. You can attack my words all you wish but they cannot effect me personally because my person of "self" has been crucified. My only motive for rebuttal to you and those like you is in standing with and for the truth as a testimony to the world, such as it is.
God's abundant grace to you all.
Red Ross
- 2 stars Rating: 36
221 votes total - Red Ross
- (243)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
soonerman504 said...
You are amazing, dodger. The exagerations and distortions, my oh my...even going so far as to say my education level is elementary. I'll have you know, I made it all the way to the 12th grade ! LOL What's more, I graduated at the top of my class. (There were two of us!!)
Funny, but there are many scientific minds who agree with my simple statements that science does not know everything and that it only knows and observes what it is currently capable of knowing. It shouldn't take much genuis to recognize this very simple point and then from there to understand that it would be foolish to base your entire belief system upon the limits of science. Anywho...I can't say it any better than this; (This is my rock)
18For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
19For it is written, “I WILL DESTROY THE WISDOM OF THE WISE, AND THE CLEVERNESS OF THE CLEVER I WILL SET ASIDE.”
20Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; 23but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness, 24but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
26For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29so that no man may boast before God. 30But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31so that, just as it is written, “LET HIM WHO BOASTS, BOAST IN THE LORD.”
While your boast is in science, mine is in the Lord. I will gladly accept the label of the foolish for believing in Him.
-
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
-
OUDodger said...
How many times do I have to say that my entire belief system isn't built on science before you will stop twisting it to that?! What is wrong with your comprehension? Seriously, what is wrong?
-I said your education ON THE SUBJECT, not your overall education. Again, reading and comprehension lets you down.
-I never said science had all the answers. Does this stuff just appear in your mind?
I love how you dodged my request that you explain your thoughts on genetics. Please reply again with random things that appear in your mind. And please keep using extremely broad thoughts on what science is/isn't. STOP DIGGING!!
soonerman504
- 1 stars Rating: 18
2005 votes total - (500)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 1 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ... | 7

Obama takes big step on Gay Marriage