Online Now 611

O'Connell's Off Topic

The place for discussion on topics not related to the Oklahoma Sooners

On this Board 12
Record: 506 (3/9/2012)

Online now 510
Record: 4487 (2/14/2012)

Boards ▾

OUInsider - Owen Field

The place for the most trusted source for reliable, accurate information on OU Sports

Basketball & Other Sports

Men's & women's basketball, baseball, softball and other OU sports

O'Connell's Off Topic

The place for discussion on topics not related to the Oklahoma Sooners

Tickets Exchange

The place to buy, sell or trade tickets

Reply

Obama takes big step on Gay Marriage

  • TIMB0B said...

    There's no point in arguing either way. The crux of the argument is about civil liberties. Should gays be allowed to marry? If you believe in individual rights, YES.

    The bigger question should be, why is the government involved with marriage to begin with? Marriage was originally a religious function, so let the churches decide on who they want to marry. And yes, there are thousands that would gladly accept and marry gays.

    Surely you relaize you have to draw the line somewhere, Tim. How about if a man wants to marry a 13 year old girl or how about his own sister ? Aren't these considered moral issues ? I think you are prostituting morals and godliness for the sake of promoting your civil liberties ideology. You go too far with it for the sake of your agenda.

    I don't know if you are a Christian or not, but churches should not be involved in advocating anything that goes against God's word by marrying gays.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • soonerman504 said...

    Surely you relaize you have to draw the line somewhere, Tim. How about if a man wants to marry a 13 year old girl or how about his own sister ? Aren't these considered moral issues ? I think you are prostituting morals and godliness for the sake of promoting your civil liberties ideology. You go too far with it for the sake of your agenda.

    I don't know if you are a Christian or not, but churches should not be involved in advocating anything that goes against God's word by marrying gays.

    Yeah, I draw the line at government bureaucracy. And what church would allow a man to marry a 13 year old or his sister? I didn't say anything about churches becoming lenient and going against God's word to marry gays, but there are churches (i.e. unitarians) that already welcome gays and would marry them. I'm not advocating immorality, but just to let people be. The sooner we leave people alone, the sooner we can live in harmony.

    TIMB0B

  • Tim I actually think child molesters are born that way too but there's a big difference.

    Child molesters abuse helpless people, gays who marry are consenting adults. Surely you can understand the difference.

    cyberthoth

  • cyberthoth said...

    Tim I actually think child molesters are born that way too but there's a big difference.

    Child molesters abuse helpless people, gays who marry are consenting adults. Surely you can understand the difference.


    What about people that are into incest, are they born that way too?

    soonerprices

  • cyberthoth said...

    Tim I actually think child molesters are born that way too but there's a big difference.

    Child molesters abuse helpless people, gays who marry are consenting adults. Surely you can understand the difference.

    What did I say about child molesters?

    TIMB0B

  • Sorry Tim I was actually trying to reply to 87Sooner and Soonerman not you. I agree with your points on this.

    As to the question about incest I don't know if that's a genetic trait or not. I don't know anyone who's committed it willingly to ask. I guess in theory there could be some genetic quality that makes people attracted to someone with like qualities hence incest.

    cyberthoth

  • cyberthoth said...

    Sorry Tim I was actually trying to reply to 87Sooner and Soonerman not you. I agree with your points on this.

    As to the question about incest I don't know if that's a genetic trait or not. I don't know anyone who's committed it willingly to ask. I guess in theory there could be some genetic quality that makes people attracted to someone with like qualities hence incest.

    Man loves to think much of his little observances, eh ? Science supposedly discovers a gene or something they then say is the CAUSE of alcoholism though I do not believe it and then science goes on to presume that these are the causes for many of man's immoralities. How nice if we could do this and not be responsible for our sins, right ? Think that will work in the day of judgment ? I think only the blood of Christ can absolve our sins.

    I can see where the unbelievers would fall for this but Christians should know better. God says these are degrading passions and thus holds us accountable for our indulgence in sins. There are many scriptural references which show that we sin because of our own lusts and desires for self gratification. Once we commit a sin it has a hold on us to do so again. The more we commit the same sin the greater the grip it has even to the point where it says we may be ensnared by the devil being held captive by him to do his will. This is why so called habitual sins are extremely hard to break.

    The great news is that Christ has made His overcoming power available to us so that if we are willing, and appropriate His life in our spirit for a walk in the spirit we can be freed from all things. As it says, “walk in the spirit and you will not carry out the desires of the flesh.” We must not attempt this by our own will power as it also says, “Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit says the Lord.”

    There are many Christians who overcame drugs, alcohol, and even homosexuality. Science merely observes what is observable within the current limitations of science and then men take that to the extreme as if to say we are not really responsible for many sins because there is a so-called abnormality within our DNA.

    Actually, the bible does say there is something terribly wrong within our being and it calls it the law of sin and the law of death. Without these there would exist no power or inclination to sin or do wrong. As it is, we fight against these inner laws but to no avail except through Christ. In Him we have the solution to these horrible laws called the law of the Spirit of Life. This is the only power strong enough to break these old laws and to set men free from the tyranny of the sin nature.

    Unfortunately, most Christians do not do a very good job of appropriating the superior law but that is because we have not been properly instructed in how to do it but that day is coming.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • TIMB0B said...

    Yeah, I draw the line at government bureaucracy....
    I'm not advocating immorality, but just to let people be. The sooner we leave people alone, the sooner we can live in harmony.

    That answer is a little vague isn't it? Can you draw a definitive line in the sand? I'm not attacking you, as I know this is hard to do. I'm just asking if you have in mind where or even how to arrive at where to draw the line. Just saying "government bureaucracy" would eliminate most if not every law on the books.

    You can't just make a vague statement such as letting people be, because there obviously have to be some laws to govern and maintain peace and order. There are laws for marriage and laws for divorce and now what , a law to redefine what marriage is, to include gays?

    And then, since the LAW is going to determine what is right and wrong in the case of marriage, even to say that it is RIGHT for same sex marriages, then because of the ensuing chaos and confusion, we have to have laws making it mandatory to propagandize our children so that they can accept what is unnatural as being right without getting confused.

    Hmmm...is this what we would call a modern, progressive culture or is it simply a return to the debauchery of old as in Sodom and Gomorrah "who gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion." ?

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • Soonerman I will gladly fight for your right to believe whatever bigoted BS your religion feels is necessary inside its Church but that stuff has no place in our government or our laws.

    You wanna believe gays are sinners fine. Do so in church. Your children can learn to hate gays, Muslims and whoever else in Bible school. Leave it there.

    Legally our government is not a theocracy and 2 out of every 10 citizens aren't Christians. Science looks at evidence and the fact millions of people say they were born gay IS evidence. Someday we will figure out why and that will be evidence too.

    You ask where do we draw the line in the sand, I say here. Leave adults to do whatever they want behind closed doors as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

    Gay marriage fine. Smoke pot fine. Cook Meth, not fine. Pedophiles not fine. It's easy and it's smaller government, something you Tea Partiers say you're for.

    cyberthoth

  • What does this mean?

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/7.html

    Definition of “marriage” and “spouse”

    In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

    soonerprices

  • cyberthoth said...

    Soonerman I will gladly fight for your right to believe whatever bigoted BS your religion feels is necessary inside its Church but that stuff has no place in our government or our laws.

    You wanna believe gays are sinners fine. Do so in church. Your children can learn to hate gays, Muslims and whoever else in Bible school. Leave it there.

    Legally our government is not a theocracy and 2 out of every 10 citizens aren't Christians. Science looks at evidence and the fact millions of people say they were born gay IS evidence. Someday we will figure out why and that will be evidence too.

    You ask where do we draw the line in the sand, I say here. Leave adults to do whatever they want behind closed doors as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

    Gay marriage fine. Smoke pot fine. Cook Meth, not fine. Pedophiles not fine. It's easy and it's smaller government, something you Tea Partiers say you're for.

    We're not that far apart here though I do take exception to the part about hating others. True Christians do not hate people. ANd I have repeatedly said I am not in favor of a theocracy, at least not until the Lord returns to be the King. Every attempt at men trying to rule men always ends up messed up.

    I also don't take the subjective opinions of men as scientific FACT especially when it contradicts nature itself , not to mention the God who created all things.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • Quote box isn't working for some reason, but this is to Soonerman...

    To put it simply, the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    In other words, states' rights overrule the federal government unless otherwise authorized by the Constitution. To paraphrase James Madison, the federal government's powers are delegated to external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.

    So, to be more specific, I draw the line at government bureaucracies that regulate our lives, which are unconstitutional.

    TIMB0B

  • TIMB0B said...

    Quote box isn't working for some reason, but this is to Soonerman...

    To put it simply, the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    In other words, states' rights overrule the federal government unless otherwise authorized by the Constitution. To paraphrase James Madison, the federal government's powers are delegated to external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.

    So, to be more specific, I draw the line at government bureaucracies that regulate our lives, which are unconstitutional.

    Thanks for that TIMBOB. I believe you have written that before about Fed vs. state delegating of powers but it must sailed right through my ears. Memory part of my brain just aint what it aughtta be.

    Since I assume you are a citizen of one of these states, that you might could be specific about some things but I don't think you are wanting to do that. I'm just trying to get you to state your position on some things just to make sure you are not simply just a pure ideologue who simply says less gov. with no specific and practical ideas on how to accomplish something in the complicated, real and practical world in which we find ourselves.

    I'm just weary of all the empty rhetoric and endless bantering over ideologies. I am ready for some real, practical and substantive changes that will make a positive improvement on our daily lives. I'm tired of all the talk about this party and that, this ideology and that one, and which is right and wrong.

    Know what I mean?

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • TIMB0B said...

    Quote box isn't working for some reason, but this is to Soonerman...

    To put it simply, the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    In other words, states' rights overrule the federal government unless otherwise authorized by the Constitution. To paraphrase James Madison, the federal government's powers are delegated to external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce.

    So, to be more specific, I draw the line at government bureaucracies that regulate our lives, which are unconstitutional.

    You should read the Supreme Court opinions (written by Justices from both sides of the political spectrum) that address the application of the Tenth Amendment. As you'll see, it means essentially nothing and that your sentence above that begins with "[i]n other words," is not correct.

    veritas1

  • Soonerman.... Just quit talking about science because you know nothing about it. Saying that scientists have identified certain genes, but you don't believe it makes you look like a fool. If we all lived like you we'd be worried about falling off the edge of the earth.

    If a doctor tells you that your kid has some terrible genetic disorder are you going to tell him that he's wrong? Hell no you won't! You'll be following his every instruction in fighting whatever the ailment might be. Your disbelief in science is always selective to fit whatever argument you might be in and is always subject to change. For that, you are a hypocrite.

    OU_dup

  • OUDodger said...

    Soonerman.... Just quit talking about science because you know nothing about it. Saying that scientists have identified certain genes, but you don't believe it makes you look like a fool. If we all lived like you we'd be worried about falling off the edge of the earth.

    If a doctor tells you that your kid has some terrible genetic disorder are you going to tell him that he's wrong? Hell no you won't! You'll be following his every instruction in fighting whatever the ailment might be. Your disbelief in science is always selective to fit whatever argument you might be in and is always subject to change. For that, you are a hypocrite.

    It would be very beneficial if you would quit putting words in my mouth. As per usual, you falsely assume and project much into what I say and it is (as usual) way off base. I NEVER said nor will say that science is useless and 100% in error. All I have ever said is that it is not 100% complete because of it's inherent limitations. This is something you refuse to acknowledge for some reason.

    Your abusive attacks on my words is a nothing but a simple method of exaggerating a person's words to the point of absurdity to discount everything he says. This is the method liberals employ against conservatives.

    As for looking like a fool, I'd say rather it is someone who stoops to the level of exaggerating and distorting what another person says for the purpose of validating his own views. I would think an astute person with 2 degrees could handle his own without resorting to cheap stunts like this.

    In the end, you have your own belief structure which is obviously based heavily upon the limited observations of science, and I have mine which are based heavily upon the truths of God and substantiated to me in my spirit.

    Evidently you are offended and angered by my rejection of your belief system and that is why you fell compelled to resort to cheap stunts like these.

    Sorry, you can fool others but you cannot fool me. My house is built upon the solid rock. You can attack my words all you wish but they cannot effect me personally because my person of "self" has been crucified. My only motive for rebuttal to you and those like you is in standing with and for the truth as a testimony to the world, such as it is.

    God's abundant grace to you all.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • Both science and religion have limited knowledge bases. We do not know everything there is to know about God. Those who believe in God have his word (the bible) and what we know I'd based on that. We don't know anymore or less than what's found in His word. And we won't know anymore until he returns. I k ow not everyone believes in God but those who do can not deny this.

    Science is also limited and science is wrong often but the thing with science is it is always learning more therefore their knowledge continues to grow science corrects it's errors and learns even more in the meantime. In fact for those who believe in God science is about the only way to learn more about Him. This takes a lot of faith and understanding ad an open mind. Many struggle having an open mind.

    soonerprices

  • veritas1 said...

    You should read the Supreme Court opinions (written by Justices from both sides of the political spectrum) that address the application of the Tenth Amendment. As you'll see, it means essentially nothing and that your sentence above that begins with "[i]n other words," is not correct.

    Ever read the doctrine of nondelegation in accordance to separation of powers?

    TIMB0B

  • soonerman504 said...

    It would be very beneficial if you would quit putting words in my mouth. As per usual, you falsely assume and project much into what I say and it is (as usual) way off base. I NEVER said nor will say that science is useless and 100% in error. All I have ever said is that it is not 100% complete because of it's inherent limitations. This is something you refuse to acknowledge for some reason.

    Your abusive attacks on my words is a nothing but a simple method of exaggerating a person's words to the point of absurdity to discount everything he says. This is the method liberals employ against conservatives.

    As for looking like a fool, I'd say rather it is someone who stoops to the level of exaggerating and distorting what another person says for the purpose of validating his own views. I would think an astute person with 2 degrees could handle his own without resorting to cheap stunts like this.

    In the end, you have your own belief structure which is obviously based heavily upon the limited observations of science, and I have mine which are based heavily upon the truths of God and substantiated to me in my spirit.

    Evidently you are offended and angered by my rejection of your belief system and that is why you fell compelled to resort to cheap stunts like these.

    Sorry, you can fool others but you cannot fool me. My house is built upon the solid rock. You can attack my words all you wish but they cannot effect me personally because my person of "self" has been crucified. My only motive for rebuttal to you and those like you is in standing with and for the truth as a testimony to the world, such as it is.

    God's abundant grace to you all.

    The same uneducated response you always make. I didn't put any words in your mouth. You use science when it benefits you, but flatly deny it when it doesn't fit your incredibly flawed arguments. I know you feel like you have to chime in on every single topic, but your ignorance shines through more times than not. Use your brain every once in a while and do some research of your own. Tell me why genetics is flawed in some instances and not in others. Back it up with a study of some sort rather than just saying you don't believe it. Oh and don't link me to some christian science website that thinks the earth is slightly older than the US.

    Don't talk about "inherent limitations" in science when you don't have anything more than an elementary education on the subject. All you do is plagiarize the ignorant talking points of people who know nothing about science and wish to know nothing about science. Do you ever have an original thought?

    And stop accusing people of putting words in your mouth when everyone here knows thats your m.o. Saying that science is my belief system shows that you're at it once again. You may think your house is "built upon solid rock", but in reality its built around ignorance, plagiarism, and bigotry.

    OU_dup

  • soonerman504 said...

    It would be very beneficial if you would quit putting words in my mouth. As per usual, you falsely assume and project much into what I say and it is (as usual) way off base. I NEVER said nor will say that science is useless and 100% in error. All I have ever said is that it is not 100% complete because of it's inherent limitations. This is something you refuse to acknowledge for some reason.

    Your abusive attacks on my words is a nothing but a simple method of exaggerating a person's words to the point of absurdity to discount everything he says. This is the method liberals employ against conservatives.

    As for looking like a fool, I'd say rather it is someone who stoops to the level of exaggerating and distorting what another person says for the purpose of validating his own views. I would think an astute person with 2 degrees could handle his own without resorting to cheap stunts like this.

    In the end, you have your own belief structure which is obviously based heavily upon the limited observations of science, and I have mine which are based heavily upon the truths of God and substantiated to me in my spirit.

    Evidently you are offended and angered by my rejection of your belief system and that is why you fell compelled to resort to cheap stunts like these.

    Sorry, you can fool others but you cannot fool me. My house is built upon the solid rock. You can attack my words all you wish but they cannot effect me personally because my person of "self" has been crucified. My only motive for rebuttal to you and those like you is in standing with and for the truth as a testimony to the world, such as it is.

    God's abundant grace to you all.

    You do have to hate the attacks and exaggerations.

    Red Ross

  • You are amazing, dodger. The exagerations and distortions, my oh my...even going so far as to say my education level is elementary. I'll have you know, I made it all the way to the 12th grade ! LOL What's more, I graduated at the top of my class. (There were two of us!!)

    Funny, but there are many scientific minds who agree with my simple statements that science does not know everything and that it only knows and observes what it is currently capable of knowing. It shouldn't take much genuis to recognize this very simple point and then from there to understand that it would be foolish to base your entire belief system upon the limits of science. Anywho...I can't say it any better than this; (This is my rock)

    18For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

    19For it is written,
    “I WILL DESTROY THE WISDOM OF THE WISE,
    AND THE CLEVERNESS OF THE CLEVER I WILL SET ASIDE.”

    20Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; 23but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness, 24but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

    26For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29so that no man may boast before God. 30But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31so that, just as it is written, “LET HIM WHO BOASTS, BOAST IN THE LORD.”

    While your boast is in science, mine is in the Lord. I will gladly accept the label of the foolish for believing in Him.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • soonerman504 said...

    You are amazing, dodger. The exagerations and distortions, my oh my...even going so far as to say my education level is elementary. I'll have you know, I made it all the way to the 12th grade ! LOL What's more, I graduated at the top of my class. (There were two of us!!)

    Funny, but there are many scientific minds who agree with my simple statements that science does not know everything and that it only knows and observes what it is currently capable of knowing. It shouldn't take much genuis to recognize this very simple point and then from there to understand that it would be foolish to base your entire belief system upon the limits of science. Anywho...I can't say it any better than this; (This is my rock)

    18For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

    19For it is written, “I WILL DESTROY THE WISDOM OF THE WISE, AND THE CLEVERNESS OF THE CLEVER I WILL SET ASIDE.”

    20Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; 23but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness, 24but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

    26For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; 27but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, 28and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are, 29so that no man may boast before God. 30But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption, 31so that, just as it is written, “LET HIM WHO BOASTS, BOAST IN THE LORD.”

    While your boast is in science, mine is in the Lord. I will gladly accept the label of the foolish for believing in Him.

    How many times do I have to say that my entire belief system isn't built on science before you will stop twisting it to that?! What is wrong with your comprehension? Seriously, what is wrong?

    -I said your education ON THE SUBJECT, not your overall education. Again, reading and comprehension lets you down.

    -I never said science had all the answers. Does this stuff just appear in your mind?

    I love how you dodged my request that you explain your thoughts on genetics. Please reply again with random things that appear in your mind. And please keep using extremely broad thoughts on what science is/isn't. STOP DIGGING!!

    OU_dup

  • soonerprices said...

    In fact for those who believe in God science is about the only way to learn more about Him. This takes a lot of faith and understanding ad an open mind. Many struggle having an open mind.

    Sorry but I disagree. It says to be transformed by the renewing of your mind and that we have the mind of Christ. It also says that He is made wisdom unto us and that in Him we have the riches of Christ.

    There are only two fundamental ways of acquiring knowledge. In fact, you could even say that these two ways are represented by the two trees from the garden of Eden. The way of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is to rely entirely upon the limited powers of the soulish part of man (mind, will and emotions) and apart from God. This means you study, you observe, you test until you meet with error and then you do it again and again and again. Each man learning from the other and building upon this base of knowledge. Since God has declared that the foolishness of God is wiser then the wisdom of men, how long do you think it will take to reach the level of God ? What's more important and telling is why even go this route when you can partake of His divine life and nature by denying this tree?

    This other tree (of life) is also a way of acquiring knowledge or wisdom directly from the source of all wisdom which is God. The key that opens this door of development in knowledge and wisdom is in shutting the other door that relies upon the powers of the soul in favor of the power of the Holy Spirit who dispenses unto us the wisdom from above which is the person of Christ. While many have traded away the knowledge of Christ for that of science, sociology, psychology, philosophy and etc I would rather trade all of these for the greater riches contained in the wisdom of Christ.

    In fact, even as a Christian I used to study psychology and self help methods until the lord opened my eyes. Once I rejected these in favor of His superior wisdom, He began to strengthen me in my spirit even causing a separation between my spirit and soul which enables one to begin a walk in this old world and yet also in fellowship with Him in the spirit.

    I found quite the opposite to your statement in that the more I tried to know Him via the confines of the soul, the more restricted and frustrated I became. When He opened my eyes and I rejected these, He then began to enable me to know Him in a way that science will never be able to do. I now know Him personally and subjectively in my spirit. More and more I know Him because He is in me and abides in me and I in Him. This way is far superior to the attainment of an impersonal objective learning ABOUT God.

    I know you have alot of learning and experience in ministry and I respect that but, I cannot deny these things which the lord Himself has taught me. This is nothing peculiar with me alone but I habe found that this is for everyone. It is the way of Christ which Paul preached in dying to self, and presenting yourself to God as those alve from the dead so that He can then dispense Himself into us for newness of life. This is the way for knowing God as opposed to merely learning doctrines and teachings about God. One is a life and living out from the spirit and the other is confined to the elementary principles of the world in the ways of learning via the soul through the arts and sciences of men.

    One is living out from the soul and one is out from the spirit. It is crucial for us to make this distinction and to make it our way.

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • OUDodger said...

    How many times do I have to say that my entire belief system isn't built on science before you will stop twisting it to that?! What is wrong with your comprehension? Seriously, what is wrong?

    -I said your education ON THE SUBJECT, not your overall education. Again, reading and comprehension lets you down.

    -I never said science had all the answers. Does this stuff just appear in your mind?

    I love how you dodged my request that you explain your thoughts on genetics. Please reply again with random things that appear in your mind. And please keep using extremely broad thoughts on what science is/isn't. STOP DIGGING!!

    Your continual emphasis on science as the basis for proving me wrong is very evident. Maybe it isn't your sole basis for your beliefs but it is obvious that you rely heavily upon it.

    You continually attempt to drag me into scientific debate but I question your motives. I am not a scientist just like you are not a renovation contractor like me. So what? I do not rely upon science to validate my knoweldge and beliefs in God nor do I need to use it to disprove the opposite. My mention of science is merely to get people to not rely upon science to come to know God because it will not and cannot happen that way. For those weak in faith, certain scientific and even archiological discoveries may strengthen their faith but I would hope it does not rest or end there because this is not suffecient. As Paul said, "and my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith would not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God."

    Science, philosophy, psychology and etc are all contained in the wisdom of men and these should not be the source or reliance upon which we hang our faith but rather upon the power of God in the spirit.

    You preach science, I preach Jesus. I fyou wish to refute my teachings on Christ and salvation than do so with scriptural basis.

    My whole point and message here is to lead men to God not to get into debates about science. You evidently wish to try to force me into the latter I suppose, because that is your area of expertise and you could and should be able to WIN if I were to so engage you there. I find it odd though that you never wish to discuss or debate me strictly on the word and truths of God since this is the sum and aim of all my thoughts and words here.

    It is therefore simply a ploy to argue with me only in science so that you can make the attempt to denigrate me and destroy my testimony of truth yet only through science. Since you cannot refute me with any scriptural basis you try instead to drag me into scientific debate. STOP DIGGING !! LOL

    signature image

    Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks

    soonerman504

  • Soonerman I don't wanna debate you on scripture I'd lose that argument.

    That said, your scripture is wrong when it comes to gays. Millions of people in this country alone say they were born that gay. That's proof and frankly it's more physical proof than anything in the Bible which as I'm sure you know relies on faith (something you can't prove)

    If we take them at their word, then discriminating against them is no different than discriminating against someone because of race or handicap. That's why I use the term "bigot" to describe anyone who believes in discriminating against gays.

    I'm not gay (married to an absolutely stunning southern belle) but I believe strongly that discrimination is evil. That's why I don't pull punches on this. If you're using the Bible to believe in discrimination you're a bigot. You may be a nice person in every other sense but you're a bigot.

    cyberthoth